[GitMensch]

This is a side issue to #398 (I'd like to provide a similar PR for that).

As I'm currently only "on the browser" I have neither tested that nor run prettier, but I think the current state is enough for a first review.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 20.55%. Comparing base (9fb2875) to head (8c926ca).
⚠️ Report is 39 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/gdb.ts	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
src/lldb.ts	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
src/mago.ts	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
src/mibase.ts	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #401      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.89%   20.55%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1771     1800      +29     
  Branches      381      388       +7     
==========================================
  Hits          370      370              
- Misses       1356     1385      +29     
  Partials       45       45              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[GitMensch]

That change is easy to test, so those should be added before pulling, too.

[GitMensch]

@WebFreak001 Should I rebase - or isn't this likely to get merged?

[WebFreak001]

feel free to merge your own commits as well, I think error message improvements and such are always very useful