feat: include user's OS and shell in LLM prompt#61
Closed
JonathanRohland-TNG wants to merge 1 commit intoTNG:mainfrom
Closed
feat: include user's OS and shell in LLM prompt#61JonathanRohland-TNG wants to merge 1 commit intoTNG:mainfrom
JonathanRohland-TNG wants to merge 1 commit intoTNG:mainfrom
Conversation
…ommand generation Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rohland <jonathan.rohland@tngtech.com>
90caea3 to
6a0045a
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
bugbot run |
🚨 BugBot failed to runRemote branch not found for this Pull Request. It may have been merged or deleted (requestId: serverGenReqId_67007f2b-34d5-4471-b330-beef9f89f4c7). |
Collaborator
Author
|
I reopened this from a branch in the source repo because Cursor's BugBot cannot handle PRs from forked repos yet (see https://forum.cursor.com/t/how-to-use-bugbot/100454) and I wanted to test this. See #62 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is an alternative take on the idea from #44 based on my review comment there: #44 (comment)