Repository navigation
Performance Regression: -13.65%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2095 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 518 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=2048/indices=64] |
280.1 µs | 482.4 µs | -41.93% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress[u8, (4000, 256)] |
34.5 µs | 48.3 µs | -28.57% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take_varbin |
332.8 µs | 415.2 µs | -19.86% |
| ❌ | Simulation | whole_array_sum_partially_valid |
65 µs | 81 µs | -19.66% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress[u16, (4000, 256)] |
51.5 µs | 60.5 µs | -14.81% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bench_many_nulls[0.01] |
60 µs | 32.9 µs | +82.19% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing mk/array-slots-inline-five (89cfd51) with develop (e8e48c8)
Footnotes
-
518 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩