Skip to content

ci(repo): move the AI review pipeline's Claude pass to claude-opus-5-5 - #6740

Merged
Coly010 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
chore/ai-review-claude-opus-5-5
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

Coly010 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
chore/ai-review-claude-opus-5-5

Conversation

@Coly010

@Coly010 Coly010 commented Sep 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Moves the AI review pipeline's Claude pass (claude-review) from claude-opus-5
to claude-opus-5-5. The Codex side stays on gpt-6-sol from #6731.

The repo's ANTHROPIC_API_KEY doesn't have access to every model (it returned 404
for claude-fable-5 when the pipeline was first set up), so the key was
checked before making this change. A throwaway push-triggered workflow on a
now-deleted branch called GET /v1/models/{id} with the secret and got HTTP 200
for both claude-opus-5 and claude-opus-5-5
(run 35860464428).

The pinned Claude Code also has to move. The first automatic review on this PR
failed in claude-review because the API rejects 2.1.247 for this model
("version 2.1.280 or newer is required"), so the pin goes to 2.1.280. That is
npm's current latest, published 2026-09-22. The stable tag is still on
2.1.267, which is too old for this model.

Linked issue

No linked issue — maintainer change.

Checklist

  • The PR title follows Conventional Commits (e.g. fix(cli): …).
  • Tests added or updated for the change. — n/a, workflow configuration only.
  • From the repository root, pnpm check:all passes; relevant package tests pass for every touched workspace, and pnpm types:check passes for each touched TypeScript workspace (or workspace declaring it).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The repo's ANTHROPIC_API_KEY was probed against GET /v1/models/claude-opus-5-5
and returned 200, so the key has access to the new model.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Coly010
Coly010 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2026 12:28

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Superseded by a newer AI review

🤖 AI Review

Claude’s independent review did not complete, so only the Codex review was available. The PR changes one workflow model identifier; inspection of the workflow found no verifiable issue.

Findings

No issues found.

Stats

Claude findings: 0 · Codex findings: 0 · Confirmed: 0 · Refuted: 0 · Uncertain: 0


Models: claude-opus-5-5 + gpt-6-sol · Trigger: auto · Workflow run

This review runs once per PR. A maintainer can request another with a /ai-review comment.

The first AI review on this branch failed in claude-review: the API
rejects Claude Code 2.1.247 for claude-opus-5-5 ("version 2.1.280 or
newer is required"). 2.1.280 is npm's current `latest`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 AI Review

Both independent reviews reported no findings. Inspection of the changed workflow confirmed that the new Claude model is used consistently and the CLI install remains pinned to an exact version. No actionable issue was found.

Findings

No issues found.

Stats

Claude findings: 0 · Codex findings: 0 · Confirmed: 0 · Refuted: 0 · Uncertain: 0


Models: claude-opus-5-5 + gpt-6-sol · Trigger: manual · Workflow run

This review runs once per PR. A maintainer can request another with a /ai-review comment.

@Coly010
Coly010 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 23, 2026
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 23, 2026
@Coly010
Coly010 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit c280138 Sep 23, 2026
41 of 43 checks passed
@Coly010
Coly010 deleted the chore/ai-review-claude-opus-5-5 branch September 23, 2026 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants