Fix performance regression in latest falco

[Stringy]

Description

Bumps the falco commit to include a fix for a performance regression in which the global g_bpf_drop_syscalls was no longer in use.

Checklist

• Investigated and inspected CI test results
  - [ ] Updated documentation accordingly

Automated testing
- [ ] Added unit tests
- [ ] Added integration tests
- [ ] Added regression tests

If any of these don't apply, please comment below.

Testing Performed

Local testing and relying on CI for other platforms.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[ghost]

COLLECTOR_TAG=3.8.x-85-g974e404b88
COLLECTOR_BUILDER_TAG=cache

Results for Performance Benchmarks on build #256182

Kernel	Method	Without Collector Time (secs)	With Collector Time (secs)	Baseline median (secs)	Collector median (secs)	PValue
rhel.rhel-7	ebpf	220.956	268.234	161.3	360.07	🔴
rhel.rhel-7	module	223.406	265.599	141.23	163.3	🔴
rhel.rhel-8	ebpf	219.009	272.65	171.25	371.77	🔴
rhel.rhel-8	module	214.456	241.318	171.05	192.4	🟢
ubuntu-os-pro.ubuntu-pro-1804-lts	ebpf	125.049	161.195	148.26	355.46	🔴
ubuntu-os-pro.ubuntu-pro-1804-lts	module	204.814	227.847	172.84	200.6	🟢
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-1804-lts	ebpf	200.348	261.823	151.6	381.68	🔴
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-1804-lts	module	192.883	216.919	153.36	175.02	🟢
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-2004-lts	ebpf	208.619	239.844	168.54	350.18	🔴
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-2004-lts	module	201.809	226.916	176.15	199.22	🟢
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-2204-lts	ebpf	197.541	208.034	198.73	365.6	🔴
ubuntu-os.ubuntu-2204-lts	module	198.18	186.022	213.5	230.88	🔴

[Stringy]

The performance numbers above relate to fixing the mistaken regression in from #601 and specifically the performance seen in this comment: #601 (comment)