Merged
Conversation
scordio
requested review from
dgray16,
fmbenhassine,
mdeinum,
meistermeier and
michael-simons
dgray16
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
meistermeier
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
mdeinum
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
Contributor
|
Happy new year everyone! I wish you all the best for 2025 and I am looking forward to collaborating with you all! Thank you for this PR, @scordio 👍 Indeed, we have a new lead for This PR is good to merge as is (I already updated the main README to reflect the current state of things). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the
CODEOWNERSconfiguration to automatically request reviews from the relevant people, based on the modified files.@fmbenhassine I couldn't set @parikshitdutta for
spring-batch-elasticsearchas GitHub reports an error due to the missing write access.