Repository navigation
Check in CI that spm deinit takes the template app back to CocoaPods
#59783
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ | ||
| #!/bin/bash | ||
| # Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. | ||
| # | ||
| # This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the | ||
| # LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. | ||
|
|
||
| # Checks that `npx react-native spm deinit` left an iOS app with only its | ||
| # CocoaPods files. It checks only what deinit removes; `pod install` restores | ||
| # the CocoaPods references, so they are not checked here. | ||
| # | ||
| # Usage: assert-spm-deinit.sh <ios-dir> <name.xcodeproj> <podfile-sha256> <gitignore-sha256|absent> | ||
|
|
||
| if [ $# -ne 4 ]; then | ||
| echo "Usage: $0 <ios-dir> <name.xcodeproj> <podfile-sha256> <gitignore-sha256|absent>" | ||
| exit 2 | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| IOS_DIR=$1 | ||
| XCODEPROJ="$IOS_DIR/$2" | ||
| EXPECTED_PODFILE_SHA256=$3 | ||
| EXPECTED_GITIGNORE_SHA256=$4 | ||
| PBXPROJ="$XCODEPROJ/project.pbxproj" | ||
| FAILED=0 | ||
|
|
||
| fail() { | ||
| echo "::error::$1" | ||
| FAILED=1 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| sha256_or_absent() { | ||
| if [ -f "$1" ]; then | ||
| shasum -a 256 "$1" | cut -d ' ' -f 1 | ||
| else | ||
| echo absent | ||
| fi | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ACTUAL_PODFILE_SHA256=$(sha256_or_absent "$IOS_DIR/Podfile") | ||
| if [ "$ACTUAL_PODFILE_SHA256" != "$EXPECTED_PODFILE_SHA256" ]; then | ||
| fail "Podfile changed: sha256 is '$ACTUAL_PODFILE_SHA256', expected '$EXPECTED_PODFILE_SHA256'." | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| ACTUAL_GITIGNORE_SHA256=$(sha256_or_absent "$IOS_DIR/.gitignore") | ||
| if [ "$ACTUAL_GITIGNORE_SHA256" != "$EXPECTED_GITIGNORE_SHA256" ]; then | ||
| fail ".gitignore changed: sha256 is '$ACTUAL_GITIGNORE_SHA256', expected '$EXPECTED_GITIGNORE_SHA256'." | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| if [ -e "$XCODEPROJ/.spm-injected.json" ]; then | ||
| fail "$XCODEPROJ/.spm-injected.json is still there." | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| if [ -e "$IOS_DIR/ReactNativeSPM" ]; then | ||
| fail "$IOS_DIR/ReactNativeSPM is still there." | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| if [ ! -f "$PBXPROJ" ]; then | ||
| fail "$PBXPROJ is missing." | ||
| else | ||
| for INJECTED in \ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I understand why this isn't a byte-for-byte comparison of the pbxproj: |
||
| XCLocalSwiftPackageReference \ | ||
| XCSwiftPackageProductDependency \ | ||
| packageReferences \ | ||
| packageProductDependencies \ | ||
| ReactNativeSPM \ | ||
| "Sync SPM Autolinking" \ | ||
| "Embed React Native Flavored Frameworks"; do | ||
| if grep -qF "$INJECTED" "$PBXPROJ"; then | ||
| fail "$PBXPROJ still contains '$INJECTED'." | ||
| fi | ||
| done | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| for SCHEME in "$XCODEPROJ"/xcshareddata/xcschemes/*.xcscheme; do | ||
| if [ -f "$SCHEME" ] && grep -qF 'title = "Sync SPM Autolinking"' "$SCHEME"; then | ||
| fail "$SCHEME still has the Sync SPM Autolinking pre-action." | ||
| fi | ||
| done | ||
|
|
||
| if [ $FAILED -ne 0 ]; then | ||
| exit 1 | ||
| fi | ||
| echo "spm deinit removed every SwiftPM change." | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ jobs: | |
| uses: ./.github/actions/setup-spm-artifacts | ||
| with: | ||
| working-directory: /tmp/RNTestProject/ios | ||
| - name: Record the Podfile and .gitignore checksums | ||
| working-directory: /tmp/RNTestProject/ios | ||
| run: | | ||
| echo "PODFILE_SHA256=$(shasum -a 256 Podfile | cut -d ' ' -f 1)" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nit: this step computes the sha256 and the |
||
| if [ -f .gitignore ]; then | ||
| echo "GITIGNORE_SHA256=$(shasum -a 256 .gitignore | cut -d ' ' -f 1)" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | ||
| else | ||
| echo "GITIGNORE_SHA256=absent" >> "$GITHUB_ENV" | ||
| fi | ||
| - name: Convert the app to SwiftPM | ||
| working-directory: /tmp/RNTestProject/ios | ||
| run: RN_STRICT_API=1 npx react-native spm add --deintegrate --artifacts /tmp/spm-artifacts --download skip | ||
|
|
@@ -80,6 +89,11 @@ jobs: | |
| name: RNTestProject-${{ matrix.flavor }} | ||
| overwrite: true | ||
| path: /tmp/RNTestProject/Build/Products/${{ matrix.flavor }}-iphonesimulator/RNTestProject.app | ||
| - name: Take the app back to CocoaPods | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd move this step and the check after it out of this workflow. If either one fails, the |
||
| working-directory: /tmp/RNTestProject/ios | ||
| run: npx react-native spm deinit | ||
| - name: Check that only the CocoaPods files are left | ||
| run: ./.github/workflow-scripts/assert-spm-deinit.sh /tmp/RNTestProject/ios RNTestProject.xcodeproj "$PODFILE_SHA256" "$GITIGNORE_SHA256" | ||
| - name: Report status | ||
| id: report-status | ||
| if: always() | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: the script fails on any
packageReferences/packageProductDependenciesin the pbxproj, so it assumes the app had no Swift packages beforespm add. That's true for the template, but the header says it checks "an iOS app". Can we say that in the comment, so nobody reuses the script on an app that already has Swift packages?