Skip to content

[3.14] gh-136968: fortify macro usage in cryptographic modules (GH-136973) - #137160

Closed
picnixz wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.14from
picnixz:backport-eefd70f-3.14
Closed

[3.14] gh-136968: fortify macro usage in cryptographic modules (GH-136973)#137160
picnixz wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.14from
picnixz:backport-eefd70f-3.14

Conversation

@picnixz

@picnixz picnixz commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Macros used in cryptographic extension modules are partially rewritten to use static inline functions when possible to help code completion. (cherry picked from commit eefd70f)

…ythonGH-136973)

Macros used in cryptographic extension modules are partially rewritten
to use `static inline` functions when possible to help code completion.
(cherry picked from commit eefd70f)

Co-authored-by: Bénédikt Tran <10796600+picnixz@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added skip news type-refactor Code refactoring (with no changes in behavior) labels Jul 28, 2025
@picnixz
picnixz marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 09:32
@picnixz
picnixz requested review from gpshead and tiran as code owners July 28, 2025 09:32
@picnixz picnixz self-assigned this Jul 28, 2025
@picnixz

picnixz commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I actually added the backports label because I feared conflicts. But... there will likely be conflicts because I moved hashlib helpers and this is something I don't want to backport to 3.14. So I'm actually not backporting this one.

@picnixz picnixz closed this Jul 28, 2025
@picnixz
picnixz deleted the backport-eefd70f-3.14 branch October 11, 2025 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting core review skip news type-refactor Code refactoring (with no changes in behavior)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant