Skip to content

Consider testing zoneinfo with tzdata PyPI package installed #99649

Description

@sobolevn

Feature or enhancement

Right now none of our build bots test zoneinfo with tzdata pypi package installed.
Proof: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/99602/files#diff-7908b1930bd1135d6f8077ef5ff578b02577f5f7042b54be88b9b86b6c7af45dR27-R35

Link to the package: https://pypi.org/project/tzdata/

However, it works locally:

(.venv) ~/Desktop/cpython  issue-99508 ✔                                             
» pip install tzdata     
Collecting tzdata
  Using cached tzdata-2022.6-py2.py3-none-any.whl (338 kB)
Installing collected packages: tzdata
Successfully installed tzdata-2022.6

(.venv) ~/Desktop/cpython  issue-99508 ✔                                             
» python
Python 3.12.0a2+ (heads/main:a3360facba, Nov 19 2022, 14:10:54) [Clang 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.16)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import importlib.metadata
>>> importlib.metadata.metadata("tzdata")
<importlib.metadata._adapters.Message object at 0x107d5df50>

But, presence / absence of this 3rd party package change the behavior of zoneinfo module: both C and Python versions of it.

So, we need to be sure that tests can check all combinations.

Risks

Right now we don't have 3rd party packages installed for tests.
This might cause quite a lot of problems: where / how / when to install it.
It also can affect test / buildbot stability, because pip sometimes just fails to install some packages and you have to retry.

Pitch

I think we should test with tzdata PyPI package installed on at least one buildbot / CI job.
The question is: how can we do it without compromising the CI setup and reliability?

Previous discussion

CC @pganssle

Activity

  1. added
    type-featureA feature request or enhancement
    testsTests in the Lib/test dir
    buildThe build process and cross-build
    on Nov 21, 2022
  2. vstinner commented on Nov 21, 2022

    @vstinner
    Member

    In general, I dislike that Python test suite depends on an external resources. It makes tests more error prone :-( Is it possible to mock the 3rd party tzdata package in tests?

  3. sobolevn commented on Nov 21, 2022

    @sobolevn
    MemberAuthor

    In general, I dislike that Python test suite depends on an external resources.

    Yes, me too. I guess this can also set a bad precedent: other 3rd-party libs can be added after that as well.

    Is it possible to mock the 3rd party tzdata package in tests?

    I was thinking about something similar. Maybe storing some old version of it in test_zoneinfo/ test package and run tests twice: with and without it.

    No idea how hard it would be, because I've never seen what's inside tzdata package 🤔

  4. vstinner commented on Nov 21, 2022

    @vstinner
    Member

    I'm not talking about an hypothetical issue. For 3 weeks, I'm getting tons of email because some buildbots fail to download data from unicode.org, and so test_unicodedata fails randomly. I qualify these issues as "network issue". It happens a lot.

    Browse https://mail.python.org/archives/list/buildbot-status@python.org/ and search for "test_unicodedata".

    Example: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/662/builds/960

    test_normalization (test.test_unicodedata.NormalizationTest) ... 	fetching http://www.pythontest.net/unicode/13.0.0/NormalizationTest.txt ...
    FAIL
    
    ======================================================================
    FAIL: test_normalization (test.test_unicodedata.NormalizationTest)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/http/client.py", line 587, in _read_chunked
        value.append(self._safe_read(amt))
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/http/client.py", line 632, in _safe_read
        raise IncompleteRead(data, amt-len(data))
    http.client.IncompleteRead: IncompleteRead(7631 bytes read, 561 more expected)
    
    During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
    
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/test/test_unicodedata.py", line 343, in test_normalization
        testdata = open_urlresource(TESTDATAURL, encoding="utf-8",
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/test/support/__init__.py", line 596, in open_urlresource
        s = f.read()
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/gzip.py", line 301, in read
        return self._buffer.read(size)
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/_compression.py", line 118, in readall
        while data := self.read(sys.maxsize):
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/gzip.py", line 494, in read
        buf = self._fp.read(io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE)
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/gzip.py", line 88, in read
        return self.file.read(size)
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/http/client.py", line 459, in read
        return self._read_chunked(amt)
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/http/client.py", line 597, in _read_chunked
        raise IncompleteRead(b''.join(value))
    http.client.IncompleteRead: IncompleteRead(0 bytes read)
    
    During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
    
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.10.cstratak-fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.clang/build/Lib/test/test_unicodedata.py", line 349, in test_normalization
        self.fail(f"Could not retrieve {TESTDATAURL}")
    AssertionError: Could not retrieve http://www.pythontest.net/unicode/13.0.0/NormalizationTest.txt
    
  5. FFY00 commented on Dec 15, 2022

    @FFY00
    Member

    As per my reply in #99602 (comment), we don't need the tzdata package. It exists as a way to support data lookup when system provided tzdata is not available. We don't actually need it to test the code that loads the tzdata that way, it can be mocked. The only reason to add it would be for an integration test, which I am under the impression it's not that common here, and I don't think it's really needed, especially considering the tzdata PyPI package just repackages the tzdata from IANA, the upstream, (https://github.com/python/tzdata/blob/master/update.py) and we already test with the system provided tzdata.

  6. hugovk commented on Jun 23, 2023

    @hugovk
    Member

    PR #19909 added Misc/requirements-test.txt and installed it as part of .github/workflows/coverage.yml and .travis.yml.

    However, PRs #25679 and #30257 removed those CI files, so Misc/requirements-test.txt is unused.

    Should we install it as part of another GitHub Actions workflow? (Replies on this issue suggest not.) Should we remove it?

  7. hugovk commented on Oct 2, 2023

    @hugovk
    Member

    Yes, let's remove Misc/requirements-test.txt. Please see PR #110240.

  8. FFY00 commented on Oct 13, 2023

    @FFY00
    Member

    @sobolevn do you think adding a test for zonoinfo._common.load_tzdata using mocks would be enough?

    I think we should add a test for zonoinfo._common.load_tzdata with mocks regardless, so that it can still be tested when the tzdata package is missing. We can then also add a test using the tzdata package, if anyone thinks it is necessary — for me, it'd be a nice to have, but probably not worth the effort on the CI maintenance.

  9. StanFromIreland commented on Oct 2, 2025

    @StanFromIreland
    Member

    Note that this would require installing tzdata 2020a (or 2020b, the tests still pass, 2021a introduces six failures), since that is what our extract was compiled with:

  10. originaonxi commented on Feb 4, 2026

    @originaonxi
  11. StanFromIreland commented on Feb 4, 2026

    @StanFromIreland
  12. StanFromIreland commented on Feb 21, 2026

    @StanFromIreland
    Member

    I set up my buildbot to cover this (and all other tests that require the 'tzdata' resource).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    infraCI, GitHub Actions, buildbots, Dependabot, etc.testsTests in the Lib/test dirtype-featureA feature request or enhancement

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions