Crash in asyncio when printing a task object at teardown

If a task object is still alive at interpreter teardown, something can try to print it. This will end in _asyncio.Future._repr_info that in turn calls:

return PyObject_CallOneArg(asyncio_future_repr_info_func, (PyObject *)self);

but asyncio_future_repr_info_func at that point can be NULL because module_free of _asynciomodule.c has been executed already, called by Py_FinalizeEx -> finalize_modules -> _PyInterpreterState_ClearModules -> ... -> module_dealloc.

The crash happens in the last _PyGC_CollectNoFail of finalize_modules so somehow the task survived the first collection and then was garbage in the second one.

I don;t have a simple repro for now, but you can get the failure by cloning https://github.com/Textualize/textual checking commit 5fe47da058564b72e5081a5658c054f55a5d85cd, installing the project and test deps and running pytest.

@graingert

CC: @graingert

Backtrace of the crash:

    frame #0: 0x00000001ac496d98 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8
    frame #1: 0x00000001ac4cbee0 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 288
    frame #2: 0x00000001ac406340 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 168
    frame #3: 0x00000001ac405754 libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 272
  * frame #4: 0x0000000103ef8984 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`PyVectorcall_Function(callable=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:68:5
    frame #5: 0x0000000103ef8870 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_PyObject_VectorcallTstate(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, callable=0x0000000000000000, args=0x000000016fdfc9e0, nargsf=9223372036854775809, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:109:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000103ef8754 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`PyObject_CallOneArg(func=0x0000000000000000, arg=0x0000000106be8d10) at abstract.h:184:12
    frame #7: 0x0000000103efe81c _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_asyncio_Future__repr_info_impl(self=0x0000000106be8d10) at _asynciomodule.c:1399:12
    frame #8: 0x0000000103efe390 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_asyncio_Future__repr_info(self=0x0000000106be8d10, _unused_ignored=0x0000000000000000) at _asynciomodule.c.h:309:12
    frame #9: 0x00000001000eac5c python`method_vectorcall_NOARGS(func=0x00000001040141d0, args=0x000000016fdfcbb8, nargsf=1, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at descrobject.c:432:24
    frame #10: 0x00000001000dcba0 python`_PyObject_VectorcallTstate(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, callable=0x00000001040141d0, args=0x000000016fdfcbb8, nargsf=1, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:114:11
    frame #11: 0x00000001000dca30 python`PyObject_VectorcallMethod(name=0x0000000103ee4d00, args=0x000000016fdfcbb8, nargsf=1, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at call.c:770:24
    frame #12: 0x0000000103efad44 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_PyObject_VectorcallMethodId(name=0x0000000103f09010, args=0x000000016fdfcbb8, nargsf=9223372036854775809, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:233:12
    frame #13: 0x0000000103efc100 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_PyObject_CallMethodIdNoArgs(self=0x0000000106be8d10, name=0x0000000103f09010) at abstract.h:239:12
    frame #14: 0x0000000103efc718 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`FutureObj_repr(fut=0x0000000106be8d10) at _asynciomodule.c:1409:23
    frame #15: 0x000000010015a928 python`PyObject_Repr(v=0x0000000106be8d10) at object.c:440:11
    frame #16: 0x00000001001a20bc python`unicode_fromformat_arg(writer=0x000000016fdfce60, f="R is not in deque", vargs=0x000000016fdfcea0) at unicodeobject.c:3090:16
    frame #17: 0x00000001001a1020 python`PyUnicode_FromFormatV(format="%R is not in deque", vargs="\U00000010\x8d\xbe\U00000006\U00000001") at unicodeobject.c:3154:17
    frame #18: 0x00000001002b3a34 python`_PyErr_FormatV(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, exception=0x000000010048cfd0, format="%R is not in deque", vargs="\U00000010\x8d\xbe\U00000006\U00000001") at errors.c:1059:14
    frame #19: 0x00000001002b3a9c python`PyErr_Format(exception=0x000000010048cfd0, format="%R is not in deque") at errors.c:1101:5
    frame #20: 0x000000010037b9ec python`deque_remove(deque=0x0000000106f53e50, value=0x0000000106be8d10) at _collectionsmodule.c:1260:9
    frame #21: 0x00000001000ead8c python`method_vectorcall_O(func=0x0000000100e5e1b0, args=0x00000001389049e0, nargsf=9223372036854775810, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at descrobject.c:460:24
    frame #22: 0x0000000100287938 python`_PyObject_VectorcallTstate(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, callable=0x0000000100e5e1b0, args=0x00000001389049e0, nargsf=9223372036854775810, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:114:11
    frame #23: 0x0000000100283c5c python`PyObject_Vectorcall(callable=0x0000000100e5e1b0, args=0x00000001389049e0, nargsf=9223372036854775810, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:123:12
    frame #24: 0x0000000100283dac python`call_function(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, trace_info=0x000000016fdfe358, pp_stack=0x000000016fdfd558, oparg=2, kwnames=0x0000000000000000) at ceval.c:5891:13
    frame #25: 0x000000010027e348 python`_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, f=0x0000000138904850, throwflag=1) at ceval.c:4198:23
    frame #26: 0x0000000100100528 python`_PyEval_EvalFrame(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, f=0x0000000138904850, throwflag=1) at pycore_ceval.h:46:12
    frame #27: 0x00000001001000fc python`gen_send_ex2(gen=0x0000000106ff43b0, arg=0x00000001004984c8, presult=0x000000016fdfe550, exc=1, closing=1) at genobject.c:213:14
    frame #28: 0x00000001000ffb14 python`gen_send_ex(gen=0x0000000106ff43b0, arg=0x00000001004984c8, exc=1, closing=1) at genobject.c:279:9
    frame #29: 0x00000001000fd7f4 python`gen_close(gen=0x0000000106ff43b0, args=0x0000000000000000) at genobject.c:384:14
    frame #30: 0x00000001000ffa28 python`gen_close_iter(yf=0x0000000106ff43b0) at genobject.c:320:18
    frame #31: 0x00000001000fd790 python`gen_close(gen=0x0000000106ff4320, args=0x0000000000000000) at genobject.c:378:15
    frame #32: 0x00000001000ffa28 python`gen_close_iter(yf=0x0000000106ff4320) at genobject.c:320:18
    frame #33: 0x00000001000fd790 python`gen_close(gen=0x0000000106ff4200, args=0x0000000000000000) at genobject.c:378:15
    frame #34: 0x00000001000ffa28 python`gen_close_iter(yf=0x0000000106ff4200) at genobject.c:320:18
    frame #35: 0x00000001000fd790 python`gen_close(gen=0x000000013886fe30, args=0x0000000000000000) at genobject.c:378:15
    frame #36: 0x00000001000fd52c python`_PyGen_Finalize(self=0x000000013886fe30) at genobject.c:87:15
    frame #37: 0x0000000100329efc python`finalize_garbage(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, collectable=0x000000016fdfe878) at gcmodule.c:982:13
    frame #38: 0x0000000100326164 python`gc_collect_main(tstate=0x0000000100a04270, generation=2, n_collected=0x0000000000000000, n_uncollectable=0x0000000000000000, nofail=1) at gcmodule.c:1287:5
    frame #39: 0x0000000100325d84 python`_PyGC_CollectNoFail(tstate=0x0000000100a04270) at gcmodule.c:2123:9
    frame #40: 0x00000001002e6be8 python`finalize_modules(tstate=0x0000000100a04270) at pylifecycle.c:1565:5
    frame #41: 0x00000001002e6824 python`Py_FinalizeEx at pylifecycle.c:1784:5
    frame #42: 0x0000000100323d54 python`Py_RunMain at main.c:668:9
    frame #43: 0x00000001003240e0 python`pymain_main(args=0x000000016fdfea00) at main.c:696:12
    frame #44: 0x0000000100324130 python`Py_BytesMain(argc=4, argv=0x000000016fdfebc8) at main.c:720:12
    frame #45: 0x0000000100003bf8 python`main(argc=4, argv=0x000000016fdfebc8) at python.c:15:12
    frame #46: 0x000000010062108c dyld`start + 520

In debug mode we get an assert failing:

* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = hit program assert
    frame #4: 0x0000000103ef8984 _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`PyVectorcall_Function(callable=0x0000000000000000) at abstract.h:68:5
   65       Py_ssize_t offset;
   66       vectorcallfunc ptr;
   67
-> 68       assert(callable != NULL);
   69       tp = Py_TYPE(callable);
   70       if (!PyType_HasFeature(tp, Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VECTORCALL)) {
   71           return NULL;
Target 0: (python) stopped.

And here is the problem already-cleaned object:

frame #7: 0x0000000103efe81c _asyncio.cpython-310d-darwin.so`_asyncio_Future__repr_info_impl(self=0x0000000106be8d10) at _asynciomodule.c:1399:12
   1396 _asyncio_Future__repr_info_impl(FutureObj *self)
   1397 /*[clinic end generated code: output=fa69e901bd176cfb input=f21504d8e2ae1ca2]*/
   1398 {
-> 1399     return PyObject_CallOneArg(asyncio_future_repr_info_func, (PyObject *)self);
   1400 }
   1401
   1402 static PyObject *
(lldb) p asyncio_future_repr_info_func
(PyObject *) $0 = NULL

This is enough to fix the segfault, but is a very incomplete fix:

diff --git a/Modules/_asynciomodule.c b/Modules/_asynciomodule.c
index 1f6de2177a..0be5ca1e8c 100644
--- a/Modules/_asynciomodule.c
+++ b/Modules/_asynciomodule.c
@@ -1396,6 +1396,10 @@ static PyObject *
 _asyncio_Future__repr_info_impl(FutureObj *self)
 /*[clinic end generated code: output=fa69e901bd176cfb input=f21504d8e2ae1ca2]*/
 {
+    if (!asyncio_future_repr_info_func) {
+        PyErr_SetString(PyExc_RuntimeError, "Printing a _asyncio.Future object at shutdown");
+        return NULL;
+    }
     return PyObject_CallOneArg(asyncio_future_repr_info_func, (PyObject *)self);
 }

Technically the crash can happen with any method.

Would be great if someone can work on a simple reproducer. We need a task/future object that survives the first collection at shutdown and something tries to print it in the second. In the reproducer, what tries to remove it is this code:

frame #20: 0x000000010037b9ec python`deque_remove(deque=0x0000000106653e50, value=0x00000001062e8d10) at _collectionsmodule.c:1260:9
   1257         }
   1258     }
   1259     if (i == n) {
-> 1260         PyErr_Format(PyExc_ValueError, "%R is not in deque", value);
   1261         return NULL;
   1262     }
   1263     rv = deque_del_item(deque, I);

that value is the task object. That happens while calling gen_close_iter on a coroutine object MessagePump._process_messages object.

@kumaraditya303

CC: @kumaraditya303 in case you want a challenge :)

I started messing around triggering Task GC in this reproducer, I'm not sure if it will help here

#94972 (comment)

@pablogsal

@pablogsal Which exact Python version and commit were you using? (The line numbers in the stack trace seem slightly off.)

Maybe this was already obvious to everybody on this issue, but from the stack trace it looks like a bunch of nested await calls are finally being terminated.

There are several await calls in MessagePump._process_messages (I didn't find this code -- Pablo mentioned it, it's in the textual package) and the last one is inside a try-finally whose finally block does more await calls (dispatching "on_idle" events, which is a textual thing).

It would seem that something is finally cancelling this stack of await calls -- the stack trace shows that it's throwing a GeneratorExit into the innermost coroutine. I suspect that this might be calling asyncio.Queue.get() (but I'm not sure).

I also note that the message pump code uses a WeakSet of tasks, and in close_messages() there is this code:

        for task in self._child_tasks:
            task.cancel()
            await task
        self._child_tasks.clear()

Would it be possible that this loop doesn't cancel all the tasks because some tasks are GC'ed elsewhere? We know that keeping a weak reference to a task is not enough to keep it alive, GC can kill it without closing it. This mechanism is only used for timers created by textual/timer.py.

Someone should probably investigate that timer class more (since there may be a clue to a simpler repro here), but I'm tired and I need to go to bed.

Oh darn, looks like I was looking at the HEAD of the main branch of textualize, instead of the commit 5fe47da058564b72e5081a5658c054f55a5d85cd as Pablo said. The finally block in _process_messages is even more complex there. :-(

I still haven't managed to create a smaller reproducer but hopefully this will be fixed once #91375 is fixed.

PR #99122 is merged now so this shouldn't happen on 3.12+. Since nobody was able to create a reproducer for this, I propose to close this as won't fix.

Agreed.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Crash in asyncio when printing a task object at teardown #96232

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Crash in asyncio when printing a task object at teardown #96232

Description

Activity

pablogsal commented on Aug 24, 2022

pablogsal commented on Aug 24, 2022

pablogsal commented on Aug 24, 2022

pablogsal commented on Aug 24, 2022

pablogsal commented on Aug 24, 2022

graingert commented on Aug 24, 2022

gvanrossum commented on Aug 29, 2022

gvanrossum commented on Aug 29, 2022

kumaraditya303 commented on Aug 30, 2022

kumaraditya303 commented on Nov 29, 2022

gvanrossum commented on Nov 29, 2022

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions