Repository navigation
feat(settings): providers can replace T3 Code's file link guidance #32254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
leodearden
wants to merge
1
commit into
pingdotgg:main
Choose a base branch
from
leodearden:feat/runtime-instructions-setting
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+323
−42
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Script executed:
rg -n 'providerInstances|vetWrite|managedInstanceLocks|instanceLocks|updateConfig' apps/server/src/policy apps/web/src/components/settings/ProviderInstanceCard.tsx apps/web/src/components/settings/ProviderSettingsPanel.tsx apps/web/src/state/managedPolicy.tsRepository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 8690
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 31360
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 43764
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 10406
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 22435
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 19385
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 7150
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 9564
Disable the file-link control for a locked instance
When policy locks this provider instance, the textarea remains editable, but its save can be rejected. Check the instance path in
managedPolicy.lockedSettingsand pass the managed reason to this form.instanceLocks.configKeysalone does not include whole-instance settings locks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. This is real, but it isn't specific to this field, so I've left it out of this PR.
When a policy locks a whole provider instance (
lockedSettings: ["providerInstances.<id>"]), nothing on the provider instance card checks for it. Display name, accent color, the regular runtime settings form (ProviderInstanceCard.tsx, theProviderSettingsFormthat passes onlymanagedInstanceLocks(...).configKeys) and Environment all stay editable today.managedInstanceLocksreads onlylimits.providers.lockedInstanceFields. This new field matches the form next to it: a policy can't pinfileLinkInstructionsper field, and a whole-instance lock is unhandled across the card.Fixing that means giving the card one read-only state for whole-instance locks. That is a separate problem, so under CONTRIBUTING's one-problem rule I'd rather it went in its own PR than in this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leodearden Thanks for the clarification. The whole-instance lock affects more than the new field, so a separate PR makes sense.
Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track it?
You are interacting with an AI system.