Repository navigation
Conversation
The README omitted Pi and Muse Code, AGENTS.md omitted Pi, Muse Code, and fx, and the FAQ omitted fx, although all three ship with their own adapters and setup guides. List them and link the README setup steps to each guide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ApprovabilityVerdict: Approved at Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — Updates provider lists and adds Pi and Muse Code setup references. These documentation-only changes do not alter product defaults or runtime behavior. You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Document provider support and setup README.md, AGENTS.md, docs/user/faq.md |
Provider lists now include Pi, Muse Code, and fx. The README adds installation and authentication instructions for Pi and Muse Code, with links to setup guides. |
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes
Change: Other
Suggested reviewers: juliusmarminge, t3dotgg
Merge Risk: 
Minimal · up to b5122
-
The provider documentation update is ready to merge after normal checks.
Pre-merge checks: 
4
-
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The description includes the required Problem, Change, Scope and approval, and Verification sections. It explains the documentation omissions, the exact changes, the rationale and prior PR context, and the checks performed with limitations noted.
-
Finishing Touches
-
Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
CodeRabbit Verify
- Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.
|
Note Written by Verified in a real dev environmentverified as-is at
the worker needed its shallow history deepened before the check could find the base. current github checks pass, with the expected docs-only skips. no source edits or pushes were needed. Not verifiedpi, muse code, and fx installation, authentication, and provider turns were not exercised; their credentials are not configured on this vm. their settings discovery and documentation links were exercised. native ios/android, electron shell, macos/windows, remote relay, and tunnel paths were not exercised on this linux web verification pass. no new runtime behavior is introduced by this pr. merge follow-upmerged current main into the existing head at blacksmith |




Problem
Pi, Muse Code, and fx ship in v0.1.6, each with its own adapter and setup guide, but the provider lists leave some of them out. The README names fx but not Pi or Muse Code. AGENTS.md names none of the three, so agents working on provider-shaped features skip them in the "Hit every surface" check. The FAQ names Pi and Muse Code but not fx.
Change
docs/user/providers-pi.mdanddocs/user/providers-muse.md.Names match the provider labels in
packages/contracts/src/model.ts. The setup lines restate the install and login steps from each provider's guide and fromdocs/user/install.md. Like the existing Cursor, Grok Build, OpenCode, and fx lines, they leave the enable-in-Settings step to the linked guide.Scope and approval
A factual docs correction for providers that already ship. It adds no capability and changes no model eligibility. It follows #25974, which added fx to the README the same way.
Verification
v0.1.6, and thatpackages/provider-pi,packages/provider-muse, andpackages/provider-fxeach have asrc/server/adapter.ts.providers-pi.md§ Set Up Pi,providers-muse.md, and theinstall.md§ Providers table: the same URLs and login commands.vp run check:changed 1d626d02d95f9a2343553f6498037ee82290d304: format passes; knip and the unused-patch check are skipped because no code or manifest changed.Not checked: no UI or runtime change, so no screenshots. I did not render the README on GitHub.
Prior PRs
#25974 by DarlingtonDeveloper added fx to the README provider lists. This PR finishes those lists the same way.
Generated with Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol in T3 Code Nightly