Repository navigation
Provide an easy way to get all net.Server connections #48433
Description
Activity
- addedfeature requestIssues requesting new Node.js features.Issues requesting new Node.js features.
on Jun 12, 2023 A similar feature was originally proposed in #42812, but I consider it an anti-pattern in Node.js (see #42812 (review)):
Constructing potentially large lists of resources generally feels like an anti-pattern in Node.js, and unless the application code is entirely synchronous, it is prone to race conditions.
- addednetIssues and PRs related to the net subsystem.Issues and PRs related to the net subsystem.
on Jun 13, 2023 Another reason not to do this is that it would be incongruent with
server.getConnections()1. That method reports connections handled by worker processes but the feature being requested here can't do that because such connections are gone.1 Which, for the record, I think is of questionable design too.
Honestly I can't imagine what current getConnections() could be useful for at all. Anyway everyone has to implement the list of connected sockets manually to be able to close the server fully. If an app serves millions of clients, the list would only occupy several MBs in memory which is nothing compared to all the allocated socket objects. Probably it's the lookups in containers with millions of items that are problem?
@tniessen @bnoordhuis If it weren't for
net.getConnections()I won't ask this feature request.
As @Antonius-S saidI can't imagine what current getConnections() could be useful for at all.
Especially @bnoordhuis said "such connections are gone", although I don't get why. If some connections are gone, what is the point of using count in its callback?
I assume
getConnections()to count connections is mostly used as a metric in practice, e.g., with Prometheus or so.And I believe what @bnoordhuis meant is that the primary process in a cluster does not have access to all connection objects because some exist in the address space / JS heap of other processes.
Reacted by Ben Noordhuisgithub-actions commented
on Dec 16, 2023 on Dec 16, 2023 – with GitHub ActionsContributorMore actionsThere has been no activity on this feature request for 5 months and it is unlikely to be implemented. It will be closed 6 months after the last non-automated comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
- addedstaleIssues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.
on Dec 16, 2023 github-actions commented
on Jan 15, 2024 on Jan 15, 2024 – with GitHub ActionsContributorMore actionsThere has been no activity on this feature request and it is being closed. If you feel closing this issue is not the right thing to do, please leave a comment.
For more information on how the project manages feature requests, please consult the feature request management document.
What is the problem this feature will solve?
Currently, there seems no way to get all
net.Serverconnections with the public API.net.server.getConnections((err, count) => {...})only returns the count of the connection, I can't get each connection within its callback. I triedfor (let socket of server.connections) {...}inside the callback, and got the error TypeError: server.connections is not iterable.I have to store each socket myself on
Event: 'connection'callback, keep an array of those socket objects.What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Inside
net.server.getConnections((err, count) => {...})callback, in addition to returning connection count, also return all the connections.What alternatives have you considered?
No response