Skip to content

Socket timeouts are checked before pending incoming requests are assigned sockets, causing ECONNRESETs #43456

Description

@zbjornson

Version

14.19.1 and others

Platform

Linux qa01-api-1 5.13.0-1024-gcp #29~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 14 23:15:00 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Subsystem

net

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Process 1:
const crypto = require("crypto");
const http = require('http');

const a = Buffer.alloc(1e8);
function doWork(ms) {
	const start = Date.now();
	while (Date.now() - start < ms) {
		crypto.randomFillSync(a);
	}
}

let socketId = 0;
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
	if (req.socket.__socketId === undefined) {
		req.socket.__socketId = socketId++;
		const st = req.socket.setTimeout;
		req.socket.setTimeout = (a, b) => {
			console.log(new Date(), "Setting timeout on socket ", req.socket.__socketId);
			return st.call(req.socket, a, b);
		};
		req.socket.once("close", () => console.log(new Date(), `Closing ${req.socket.__socketId}`));
	}

	const reqId = req.headers["x-request-id"];
	console.log(new Date(), `[${reqId}] got request on socket ${req.socket.__socketId}`);
	doWork(1500);
	console.log(new Date(), `[${reqId}] sending response`);
	res.end('hello world\r\n');
});

server.keepAliveTimeout = 1000; // shortened from default 5000 to make test faster

server.listen(8080, '127.0.0.1');
Process 2:
const http = require('http');

const keepAliveAgent = new http.Agent({
	keepAlive: true,
	maxSockets: 2
});

let socketId = 0;

for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
	const req = http.request({
		agent: keepAliveAgent,
		host: '127.0.0.1',
		port: 8080,
		method: 'GET',
		headers: {
			"X-Request-Id": `${i}`
		}
	});

	req.end();

	req.once("socket", socket => {
		if (socket.__id === undefined) socket.__id = socketId++;
		console.log(new Date(), `[${i}] assigned socket ${socket.__id}`);
	});

	req.on('response', function _onResponse(res) {
		res.on('data', function _onData(chunk) {});

		res.on('end', function _doneResponse() {
			console.log(new Date(), `[${i}] res.end`);
		});
	});

	req.on('error', function _onError(err) {
		console.log(new Date(), `[${i}] req.error`, err);
	});
}

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

100%

What is the expected behavior?

All three requests should succeed.

What do you see instead?

The server logs will look like this:

2022-06-16T22:37:50.307Z [0] got request on socket 0
2022-06-16T22:37:51.809Z [0] sending response
2022-06-16T22:37:51.813Z Setting timeout on socket  0
2022-06-16T22:37:51.814Z [1] got request on socket 1
2022-06-16T22:37:53.317Z [1] sending response
2022-06-16T22:37:53.318Z Setting timeout on socket  1
2022-06-16T22:37:53.320Z Closing 0
2022-06-16T22:37:53.323Z Closing 1

and client

2022-06-16T22:37:50.303Z [0] assigned socket 0
2022-06-16T22:37:50.305Z [1] assigned socket 1
2022-06-16T22:37:51.814Z [0] res.end
2022-06-16T22:37:51.815Z [2] assigned socket 0
2022-06-16T22:37:53.318Z [1] res.end
2022-06-16T22:37:53.321Z [2] req.error Error: read ECONNRESET
    at TCP.onStreamRead (internal/stream_base_commons.js:209:20) {
  errno: -104,
  code: 'ECONNRESET',
  syscall: 'read'
}

Notice: req[2] is assigned a socket at 51.815, just after req[1] is received by the server. Server socket[0] is closed at 53.320, just after the blocking work on req[2], even though there's a request that could be assigned to that socket. I think what's happening is that timers are checked before pending incoming messages are assigned sockets.

Additional information

ECONNRESETs due to Keep-Alive races need to be handled by clients (see #20256, #38890 and several others), but I think this particular scenario can be fixed to avoid a subset of them.

Activity

  1. added
    httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.
    on Jun 17, 2022
  2. theanarkh commented on Jun 17, 2022

    @theanarkh
    Contributor

    I think it's because when a socket times out, Node.js can't tell the two cases

    1. there's really no data coming.
    2. the code is taking too long to execute.
      This is the packet I caught.

    image

  3. zbjornson commented on Jun 17, 2022

    @zbjornson
    ContributorAuthor

    Hm, that's not how I interpret these logs. In this capture, the highlighted row (13) is the 3rd request:

    image

    And the corresponding Node.js logs:

    11:14:40.382 [0] assigned socket 0
    11:14:40.384 [1] assigned socket 1
    11:14:41.901 [0] res.end
    11:14:41.902 [2] assigned socket 0
    11:14:43.407 [1] res.end
    11:14:43.409 [2] req.error Error: read ECONNRESET
    
    11:14:40.386 [0] got request on socket 0
    11:14:41.897 [0] sending response
    11:14:41.900 Setting timeout on socket  0
    11:14:41.901 [1] got request on socket 1
    11:14:43.406 [1] sending response
    11:14:43.407 Setting timeout on socket  1
    11:14:43.408 Closing 0
    11:14:43.412 Closing 1
    

    Key points:

    • Client's request is assigned a socket at 41.902
    • Server receives the the request at 41.902 (13)
    • Server sets timeout on socket at 43.407
    • Server closes socket at 43.412 just 5 ms later, even though it looks like there's a request that could use it since 41.902. (I think that closure is the FIN in row 19)
  4. theanarkh commented on Jun 17, 2022

    @theanarkh
    Contributor

    Sorry, i can not get the point. The reason why the socket 1 is closed(by client) early(5 ms) is the client have exited, when you add setInterval(() => {}, 10000) to client.js. the socket 1 will be closed by server after 1 s.
    The process is as follow.

    1. client sends two reqs concurrently.
    2. server receives req 0 on socket 0, handle it, setTimeout 1s.
    3. client sends the third req(req 2) on socket 0 to server.
    4. server receives req 1 on socket 1, handle it, setTimeout 1s.
      after req 1 is handled socket 0 is timeout before receive req 2, and the timeout callback destroy the socket 0 which make the client exit and close the socket 1.
  5. codinbox commented on Jul 13, 2022

    @codinbox

    Client assigned req 2
    11:14:41.902 [2] assigned socket 0

    server closed socket 0
    11:14:43.408 Closing 0

    Why socket 0 didnt handle req 2? It came before the socket closed on server and before timeout (1 sec after sending response).

  6. github-actions commented on Jun 25, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue has been marked as stale due to 210 days of inactivity.
    It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

  7. added
    staleIssues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.
    on Jun 25, 2026
  8. github-actions commented on Jul 26, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue has been automatically closed after 30 days of inactivity following its stale status (no activity for a total of 120 days).
    If this is still relevant, feel free to reopen it or leave a comment with additional details so we can continue the discussion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.staleIssues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions