Repository navigation
Investigate test-child-process-fork-closed-channel-segfault #20836
Description
Activity
- addedchild_processIssues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.Issues and PRs related to the Windows platform.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.flaky-testIssues and PRs involving tests that fail intermittently in CI.Issues and PRs involving tests that fail intermittently in CI.
on May 19, 2018 For the first one,
EMFILEis predicted to occur according to this comment but not sure why it wasn't captured in the test.@gireeshpunathil The test checks that
err.messageis'Channel closed'and it's not forEMFILE. Not sure if that's a recent change to the message or what. The code that checks for that string was added in #8954 by @santigimeno (when the test had a different name--it was subsequently renamed).@nodejs/testing @nodejs/platform-windows @nodejs/child_process
(Interestingly, the string was
'channel closed'in the original PR but is now'Channel closed'with different capitalization.)Reacted by Gireesh PunathilAnd another one (again both tests failed - I wonder if the first test has influence on the second one).
One issue with
test-child-process-fork-netis that is uses bothconsole.log()andconsole.error(). The test runner does not preserve the interleaving of messages from stdout and stderr, so the messages as shown in CI are not the order they appear in when you run the test from the command line. PR to fix that aspect of things: #20873 A 👍 to fast-track that would be great.Better output for test-child-process-fork-net (stdout and stderr properly interleaved):
not ok 52 parallel/test-child-process-fork-net --- duration_ms: 0.324 severity: fail exitcode: 1 stack: |- PARENT: server listening CHILD: server listening CLIENT: connected PARENT: got connection CLIENT: connected CHILD: got connection CLIENT: closed CHILD: got connection CHILD: got connection CLIENT: closed CLIENT: connected CLIENT: connected CLIENT: closed CLIENT: closed PARENT: server closed testSocket, listening CHILD: got socket CLIENT: got data CLIENT: closed events.js:167 throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event ^ Error: write EPIPE at ChildProcess.target._send (internal/child_process.js:741:20) at ChildProcess.target.send (internal/child_process.js:625:19) at SocketListSend._request (internal/socket_list.js:20:16) at SocketListSend.close (internal/socket_list.js:40:10) at Server.close (net.js:1624:24) at Socket.<anonymous> (c:\workspace\node-test-binary-windows\test\parallel\test-child-process-fork-net.js:178:16) at Socket.emit (events.js:182:13) at TCP._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:596:12) Emitted 'error' event at: at process.nextTick (internal/child_process.js:745:39) at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:61:11) ...
I tried to run Windows stress tests for this to see how often it fails but after compiling for a long time, the builds hit a three-minute timeout and don't run the tests. See https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/1858/nodes=win2016-1p-vs2017/console and https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/1857/nodes=win2016-1p-vs2017/console.
19:31:05 Creating library c:\workspace\node-stress-single-test\nodes\win2016-1p-vs2017\Release\mksnapshot.lib and object c:\workspace\node-stress-single-test\nodes\win2016-1p-vs2017\Release\mksnapshot.exp 19:31:05 Generating code 19:34:05 Build timed out (after 3 minutes). Marking the build as aborted. 19:34:05 Build was aborted 19:34:05 Notifying upstream projects of job completion 19:34:05 Finished: ABORTED
@nodejs/build
On my Win 10 box
test-child-process-fork-closed-channel-segfaultfails about 6% times aboutparallel/test-child-process-fork-netfails about once every 30k runs.@apapirovski sure, I'll take a look
Reacted by Anatoli PapirovskiReacted by Anatoli PapirovskiJust my 2c but this test has been flaky since its introduction, only very infrequently replicates the condition on the originally bugged version (Node 4.0.0) and is unlikely to occur exactly like this again. As such, I think we should scrap the test and move the one important check (
assert.strictEqual(worker.process.channel, null);) into another test that uses child_process in a similar manner.If we try to fix it yet again, it'll be a 6th PR to make this test less flaky. There are currently 5 separate error conditions that we ignore in this. We might be adding a sixth. IMO it's more trouble than it's worth.
5 remaining items
Is
parallel/test-child-process-fork-netactually related or should we open another issue to fix it?@mmarchini - looking the failing stack, I believe it is the same issue. So you can apply the same patch as in #20973 over there too, if you are going for a PR. However, I have found issues with it, and please wait while we fix this.
@gireeshpunathil do you mind if I open a PR to fix
parallel/test-child-process-fork-netas well?Reacted by Gireesh Punathil
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-binary-windows/17414/COMPILED_BY=vs2017,RUNNER=win2016,RUN_SUBSET=3/console
Likely related: