Skip to content

docs: clarify server-specific tool naming - #4907

Open
liang0417 wants to merge 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
liang0417:codex/fix-tool-naming-guidance
Open

liang0417 wants to merge 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
liang0417:codex/fix-tool-naming-guidance

Conversation

@liang0417

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • clarify that registered capability names follow each server's existing public convention
  • document snake_case for filesystem and memory, and kebab-case for everything
  • warn against renaming published tools, prompts, or resources only to change casing

Closes #4892

Verification

  • confirmed all 14 filesystem and 9 memory tool registrations use snake_case
  • confirmed everything tool registrations use kebab-case
  • git diff --check passes

Testing

Documentation-only change; no runtime code changed.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CLAUDE.md: tool-naming rule (kebab-case) disagrees with filesystem and memory servers

1 participant