Add initial task extension conformance coverage#1734
Merged
PranavSenthilnathan merged 5 commits intoJul 25, 2026
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 7c99928c-a943-49f4-9a63-8b04a0e4d18b
Remove the proposed per-tool execution mode API and enable only the task scenarios supported by the existing global task-store behavior. Keep deferred scenarios listed for future API work. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 7c99928c-a943-49f4-9a63-8b04a0e4d18b
PranavSenthilnathan
force-pushed
the
pranavsenthilnathan-prototype-task-conformance
branch
from
July 24, 2026 21:52
501854b to
2f19b70
Compare
PranavSenthilnathan
changed the title
PranavSenthilnathan
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 24, 2026 22:31
jeffhandley
previously approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
jeffhandley
left a comment
jeffhandley
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Cool seeing the gates implemented, how cleanly this plugs and passes. Cheers!
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 7c99928c-a943-49f4-9a63-8b04a0e4d18b
jeffhandley
previously approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 7c99928c-a943-49f4-9a63-8b04a0e4d18b
jeffhandley
previously approved these changes
Jul 24, 2026
jeffhandley
left a comment
jeffhandley
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will change the diagnostic in a separate PR
PranavSenthilnathan
enabled auto-merge (squash)
July 24, 2026 23:56
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 7c99928c-a943-49f4-9a63-8b04a0e4d18b
jeffhandley
reviewed
Jul 25, 2026
jeffhandley
reviewed
Jul 25, 2026
jeffhandley
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2026
PranavSenthilnathan
merged commit Jul 25, 2026
83523b0
into
modelcontextprotocol:main
9 checks passed
PranavSenthilnathan
deleted the
pranavsenthilnathan-prototype-task-conformance
branch
July 25, 2026 00:16
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds initial task-extension coverage from
@modelcontextprotocol/conformancealpha.9 without introducing new public API.tasks-wire-fields,tasks-request-state-removal, andtasks-mrtr-inputagainst the existing globalWithTasks(store)behavior.The deferred scenarios mostly require per-tool synchronous/optional/required task configuration that the SDK does not currently expose.
tasks-status-notificationsseparately awaits an upstreamsubscriptions/listenharness rewrite.Validation
dotnet buildPartially implements #1732.