Feature Request: Provide more weights

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Many IDE's do not have the settings as a configurable file( like some text editors: example Atom has stylesheet.less, Visual Studio Code has settings.json ) where you can choose the weight of the font.
I am thinking that more weights would be awesome to have. I really like the Iosevka structure:
It has weights 8 weights but it would be more than enough to have 4 Light, Regular, Medium and Bold:
Thin
Thin italic
Thin oblique

Extralight
Extralight italic
Extralight oblique

Light
Light italic
Light oblique

Regular
Italic
Oblique

Medium
Medium italic
Medium oblique

Semibold
Semibold italic
Semibold oblique

Bold
Bold italic
Bold oblique

Extrabold
Extrabold italic
Extrabold oblique

I am not sure if the font needs both an Italic and an Oblique. They both serve the same purpose, except an Italic will alter the letter shapes to better suit the slant - whereas an Oblique is mostly the same letters, but slanted.

Martin Anderson (@mdtauk)

4 are must have : Italic, Regular, Medium and Bold any additional weight would be just a bonus
Martin Anderson (@mdtauk) I agree

I made an issue #90 asking for it to be a Variable font, which would allow for using a slider or numeric value like 450 to set the weight of the font.

It would also allow setting the width of the characters, which would allow narrow, normal to wide characters.

I know this is a great feature but this would be helpful just for the text editors/IDE's that allow writing stylesheet for the editor. This would work if they make use of the fact that "it will be a variable" font and generate or make a way to generate the font weights.

I know this is a great feature but this would be helpful just for the text editors/IDE's that allow writing stylesheet for the editor. This would work if they make use of the fact that "it will be a variable" font and generate or make a way to generate the font weights.

Most Variable fonts tend to export some fixed instance weights, as well as include the "breakpoints" for those weights within the font, for compatibility with older software.

It makes the creating of the font much easier, as it is a single set of outlines to maintain.

Martin Anderson (@mdtauk)

Martin Anderson (@mdtauk) very clear explanation, thank you !

Hi, guys, I'm not an expert at all in this area, but what I see is that this nice font renders too bold, using Intellij IDEA on MacOS. Is there anything that could be done about it, or ..?

Thanks for the really nice font!

+1 I'd love to have a light version of this font, because even with 100% dpi scaling everything is so chunky in VSCode it feels like the letters leak into eachother. (on W10)
In cmd it feels better though I don't know why.

Can we get a compressed version?

My preference is Consolas (and Roboto Mono), too bad Consolas has horribly glyph support and very few math glyphs .

I'd love to have a light version of this font. I'm using FiraCode Light weight, size 15. I tryed Cascadia but it's so chunky and bold on VS 2019 (Windows 10).

Still wait for Light built version, it's bold in Intellij

I would describe the current default weight as more of a Semi/Demi Bold, than a true Bold. Certainly chunky compared to most Regular/Normal or Medium weights.

this is probably the most anticipated feature

For those that want a thinner font on JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, Webstorm, etc), try going to Appearance & Behavior > Appearance > Antialiasing and changing it to Greyscale. This could be considered a temp fix till this issue is resolved.

For those that want a thinner font on JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, Webstorm, etc), try going to Appearance & Behavior > Appearance > Antialiasing and changing it to Greyscale. This could be considered a temp fix till this issue is resolved.

Thanks for the tip. Made it much less of an eyesore for me. FYI, a similar result can be achieved in VSCode by setting 'Font Aliasing' to 'antialiased' in settings.

"eyesore" is a terrifically unkind thing to say about somebody else's project. 😄

Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) (@DHowett-MSFT)

Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) (@DHowett-MSFT) You're right. I love the FF itself - I moreso meant the bolder typeface alongside the rest of my specific editor setup made it an eyesore.. It's certainly not the designer's problem that I didn't figure out what settings to use with it sooner 😬

good font.but it seems everything is bold in termimal, regular font weight is really need.

It will come ~March, check: https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code/wiki/Roadmap

The font is nice, but looks bold in Visual Studio. A light weight would be very visually pleasing for pages with lots of markup.

Worth making sure you have antialiasing turned on in your IDE especially if you're using a hi-dpi monitor like any recent macbook. In sublime you set the following in your preferences:

        "font_options":
	[
		"gray_antialias"
	],

It will come ~March, check: https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code/wiki/Roadmap

March can't come soon enough

Need a `Light` weight variant that's crisp.

Cascadia Code PL definitely need to go on a diet.

Roboto Mono Light for Powerline

Cascadia Code PL

Consolas

FYI, this seems to have been resolved with the latest release. I see that the bold font now renders fine in Intellij Idea:

I think it is still using a faux bold, but with new hinting.

Hey maintainers! Are you able to share any updates about progress towards this?

No pressure at all, just excited for the lighter weights as my (very subjective) eye struggles with legibility of the regular weight.

Thank you!

Make Cascadia Code a variable font w/ 6 named variations (#304)

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Feature Request: Provide more weights #128

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Need a `Light` weight variant that's crisp.

Roboto Mono Light for Powerline

Cascadia Code PL

Consolas

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Feature Request: Provide more weights #128

Description

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Activity

mdtauk commented on Sep 28, 2019

astrolemonade commented on Sep 28, 2019

mdtauk commented on Sep 28, 2019

astrolemonade commented on Sep 29, 2019

mdtauk commented on Sep 29, 2019

astrolemonade commented on Sep 29, 2019

dodalovic commented on Oct 2, 2019

GergiH commented on Oct 4, 2019

musm commented on Oct 7, 2019

musm commented on Oct 7, 2019

Braytiner commented on Oct 7, 2019

txhai commented on Nov 21, 2019

mdtauk commented on Nov 21, 2019

tuananh commented on Nov 23, 2019

TaylorRayHoward commented on Dec 2, 2019

m1kethai commented on Dec 2, 2019

DHowett-MSFT commented on Dec 2, 2019

m1kethai commented on Dec 3, 2019

emailsters commented on Jan 17, 2020

GergiH commented on Jan 17, 2020

lhughey commented on Jan 23, 2020

patrickfatrick commented on Jan 30, 2020

tuananh commented on Feb 11, 2020

SidShaytay commented on Mar 19, 2020

Need a Light weight variant that's crisp.

Roboto Mono Light for Powerline

Cascadia Code PL

Consolas

electronic-dk commented on May 13, 2020

mdtauk commented on May 13, 2020

idan commented on Jun 4, 2020

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Need a `Light` weight variant that's crisp.