Repository navigation
[Spike/Discussion] The proposal of the new requestBody decorator #3493
Description
Description
A follow up story of #2654
In the spike story #2654, @jannyHou proposed a new signature @requestBody(spec, model, schemaOptions) to simplify the way of providing schema configs, the design is explained in file.
This story is created for further discussion:
The conversations are mainly tracked in: #2654, #3398 and #3466 (comment)
There are different proposals from @bajtos (I will summarize Miroslav's opinions later)
- @requestBody(specWithOptions, model)
- or @requestBody(spec, getModelSchemaRef(model, options))
- or any better signatures
Acceptance criteria
- Let's agree on the proposal first
- If we agree on the original proposal mentioned in file, decide which signatures should be disabled
- Related discussion: follow the chat in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/pull/3466/files#r308655533
Activity
emonddr commentedon Oct 10, 2019
Let's have a meeting to discuss this first.
stale commentedon Dec 25, 2020
This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the
CODEOWNERSfile at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.stale commentedon Jul 14, 2021
This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the
CODEOWNERSfile at the top-level of this repository.