PoC for Immutable - Reselect

[alejandronanez]

I'm creating this issue to keep track of the PoC with Immutable + Reselect, will add those to a small part of the app to see what everybody thinks.

[housseindjirdeh]

Looking forward to it matey, any help please don't hesitate to ask 🙌

[zcei]

Out of interest: what do you mean with "Immutable"? Immutable.js?

Wondering whether that's really necessary when already utilizing redux, which embraces immutable data structures, but with the plain vanilla js data types.

👍 for reselect

[alejandronanez]

@zcei Yes I meant Immutable.js, with it we can have some nice models + will be forced to manage immutability (no risk of mutating the state at all)
Redux needs immutability but there's nothing stopping you from mutating the state.

[zcei]

Mhm I like the idea of clearly defined models, just never saw the purpose of putting more overhead on top of the plain types. But yeah, it puts more responsibility on the contributors.
(Otherwise one would likely put its own layers on top, like joi schema validation.)

Thank you for the clarification!

[alejandronanez]

You're welcome @zcei, we'll see how it goes.
Does Joi enforce Immutability? I have no experience with it.

[zcei]

The joi objects and methods themselves are immutable, but I don't think they enforce it on the objects that are checked. That was more for the "clearly defined model" part.

If you're really scared people would mutate the state, in development one could freeze the state tree (which for performance reason should never be a production middleware 🙂 ).

I'm just afraid that Immutable.js actually makes it harder for people to contribute and feels like an "eternal lock in" as now each and every piece of the app (except for the presentational components) needs to be aware it is not receiving a plain object, but a special wrapper.

[housseindjirdeh]

I also feel the same with introducing a library like Immutable.js hence why I was hesitant at first as well. However definitely open to giving it a shot if everyone feels like the benefits of including it outweigh any potential concerns.

[alejandronanez]

I'm sure we at least use something of my work on this haha ;)

[alejandronanez]

We have a PR for this in #269