the standard lists an exception where some explicit constructors may be constrained and therefore not actually overload implicit copy/move ctors.
the current implementation does not cover this,
further consideration is required to determine if the exception is possible and also valuable
consider the following :
not c.getTemplateArgument(_).toString().matches("%enable_if%") or maybe not c.getTemplateArgumentKind(_).toString().matches("%enable_if%")
but this wont work for functions where the types in the argument actually resolve if the function is called
the standard lists an exception where some explicit constructors may be constrained and therefore not actually overload implicit copy/move ctors.
the current implementation does not cover this,
further consideration is required to determine if the exception is possible and also valuable
consider the following :
not c.getTemplateArgument(_).toString().matches("%enable_if%")or maybenot c.getTemplateArgumentKind(_).toString().matches("%enable_if%")but this wont work for functions where the types in the argument actually resolve if the function is called