feat: Add Python Virtual Environment Support: Add k8s Gateway Configuration#5138
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
engine
frontend
SarahAsad23
changed the title
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5138 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 49.09% 49.10% +0.01%
- Complexity 2372 2373 +1
============================================
Files 1051 1051
Lines 40344 40348 +4
Branches 4277 4279 +2
============================================
+ Hits 19805 19814 +9
+ Misses 19379 19371 -8
- Partials 1160 1163 +3
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
6 tasks
kunwp1
requested changes
May 24, 2026
kunwp1
left a comment
kunwp1
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good in general. Left some comments.
…into pve-deployment
kunwp1
approved these changes
May 28, 2026
kunwp1
left a comment
kunwp1
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! Before merging this PR can you also address the codecov report to increase the coverage?
Contributor
Author
|
I checked the Codecov report, and the AccessControlResource changes are already covered by the tests added in AccessControlResourceSpec. The remaining missing lines are in the PVE related resource/service files and the computing unit selection component, but those are already covered by the PythonVirtualEnvironmentResourceSpec added in a previous PR. |
yangzhang75
pushed a commit
to yangzhang75/texera
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2026
…ration (apache#5138) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request (PR)! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: [Contributing to Texera](https://github.com/apache/texera/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) 2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR 3. If the PR is work in progress, mark it a draft on GitHub. 4. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes, we are following Conventional Commits style for PR titles as well. 5. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. --> ### What changes were proposed in this PR? <!-- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes. Here are some tips for you: 1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API. 2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug. 3. If it is a refactoring, clarify what has been changed. 3. It would be helpful to include a before-and-after comparison using screenshots or GIFs. 4. Please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews. --> This PR is an extension of PR apache#4484, apache#4902, apache#5035, and apache#5069. It adds Kubernetes gateway routing and access control configurations. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? <!-- Please use this section to link other resources if not mentioned already. 1. If this PR fixes an issue, please include `Fixes apache#1234`, `Resolves apache#1234` or `Closes apache#1234`. If it is only related, simply mention the issue number. 2. If there is design documentation, please add the link. 3. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link. --> This change is part of ongoing efforts to support environment isolation and reproducibility within Texera. Related issue includes apache#4296. This PR closes sub-issue apache#5137. ### How was this PR tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Or simply mention that if the PR is tested with existing test cases. Make sure to include/update test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future. If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add. --> Tested manually and test added to AccessControlResourceSpec. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? <!-- If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, please include the phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version. If no, write 'No'. Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details. --> Co-authored using: Claude Code (claude-opus-4-7) --------- Co-authored-by: Kunwoo (Chris) <143021053+kunwp1@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this PR?
This PR is an extension of PR #4484, #4902, #5035, and #5069. It adds Kubernetes gateway routing and access control configurations.
Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
This change is part of ongoing efforts to support environment isolation and reproducibility within Texera. Related issue includes #4296. This PR closes sub-issue #5137.
How was this PR tested?
Tested manually and test added to AccessControlResourceSpec.
Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Co-authored using: Claude Code (claude-opus-4-7)