Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #4192
Rationale for this change
Transaction.dynamic_partition_overwritewrote its data files using thecommitted table metadata, but built its delete filter from the transaction's
metadata. After an
update_specin the same transaction, the two disagree onthe partition spec, so the wrong rows can be deleted and new files recorded
under the wrong partition. After an in-transaction
add_column, it raisesValueErrorinstead.This passes
self.table_metadatato_dataframe_to_data_files, matchingappend,overwriteanddelete.Are these changes tested?
Yes. Two new tests cover
update_specandadd_columninside a transaction.Both fail without the fix and pass with it. The full unit suite, the Docker
integration suite and the lint hooks pass locally.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, only as the bug fix: both cases now behave correctly.