Skip to content

server: avoid NPE updating a network ACL rule with no protocol - #14046

Open
nagaboinaramgopal wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:4.20from
nagaboinaramgopal:fix/networkacl-fullupgrade-null-protocol
Open

nagaboinaramgopal wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:4.20from
nagaboinaramgopal:fix/networkacl-fullupgrade-null-protocol

Conversation

@nagaboinaramgopal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

On a full (non-partial) network ACL item update, transferDataToNetworkAclRulePojo clears the protocol to null before updateIcmpCodeAndTypeFullUpgrade runs, and that method called networkACLItemVo.getProtocol().equalsIgnoreCase(...) on the null protocol, throwing NullPointerException. A full upgrade with no protocol is a valid input. Compare against the constant first so a null protocol falls through to clearing the icmp fields.

Tested: new unit test updateIcmpCodeAndTypeFullUpgradeHandlesNullProtocol (fails before, passes after); full NetworkACLServiceImplTest green

On a full (non-partial) network ACL item update, transferDataToNetworkAclRulePojo
clears the protocol to null before updateIcmpCodeAndTypeFullUpgrade runs, and
that method called networkACLItemVo.getProtocol().equalsIgnoreCase(...) on the
null protocol, throwing NullPointerException. A full upgrade with no protocol is
a valid input: the parameter is optional and the mode is meant to disregard the
current configuration. Compare against the constant first so a null protocol
falls through to clearing the icmp fields.

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.34%. Comparing base (2cd8c5e) to head (db4940c).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on 4.20.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #14046      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.34%   16.34%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    13574    13572       -2     
============================================
  Files          5669     5669              
  Lines        501368   501368              
  Branches      60903    60903              
============================================
- Hits          81964    81948      -16     
- Misses       410219   410233      +14     
- Partials       9185     9187       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.14% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.20% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19186

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan test keepEnv

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16969)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 51050 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr14046-t16969-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
ContextSuite context=TestClusterDRS>:setup Error 0.00 test_cluster_drs.py

@nagaboinaramgopal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks @DaanHoogland for the review and the smoke run. This needs a second review; could someone take a look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants