Skip to content

Add performance indexes - #13856

Draft
sb-abhish3k wants to merge 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
shapeblue:add-performance-indexes
Draft

Add performance indexes#13856
sb-abhish3k wants to merge 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
shapeblue:add-performance-indexes

Conversation

@sb-abhish3k

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Adds performance indexes for common DB lookups.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.74%. Comparing base (5e5ae0c) to head (bdf94b2).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13856      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     19.72%   19.74%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    19941    19962      +21     
============================================
  Files          6371     6371              
  Lines        575738   575784      +46     
  Branches      70471    70478       +7     
============================================
+ Hits         113582   113672      +90     
+ Misses       449810   449758      -52     
- Partials      12346    12354       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests 21.02% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-42210to42300.sql Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@sb-abhish3k

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sb-abhish3k a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18968

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland moved this from Backlog to Ready in CloudStack Testing Aug 31, 2026
@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-16850)

Signed-off-by: Abhishek <abhishek.kumar@shapeblue.com>
@shwstppr

shwstppr commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19038

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm, but I think we are about to release 23, so the calls will need to be moved soon/before merging

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland assigned shwstppr and unassigned shwstppr Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Ready

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants