ui package upgrades - #13632
Conversation
f22a38a to
2356504
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #13632 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 19.73% 19.73%
- Complexity 19940 19942 +2
==========================================
Files 6371 6371
Lines 575734 575374 -360
Branches 70470 70470
==========================================
- Hits 113594 113550 -44
+ Misses 449793 449475 -318
- Partials 12347 12349 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
🔴 Test Coverage Grade:
|
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | 24.50% |
| Branch coverage | 18.66% |
Grade Scale
| Grade | Line Coverage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 A | ≥ 80% | Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴 |
| 🟡 B | 60-79% | Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉 |
| 🟠 C | 40-59% | Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬 |
| 🔴 D | 20-39% | Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖 |
| ⛔ F | < 20% | Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥 |
Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run
Fixes 17 CVEs in dompurify 3.2.6 including multiple XSS bypass vulnerabilities (GHSA-cjmm-f4jc-qw8r, GHSA-cmwh-pvxp-8882, et al.). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes GHSA-wc69-rhjr-hc9g in moment 2.29.3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes GHSA-qjx8-664m-686j. Note: major version bump — js-cookie 3.x drops the global Cookies object; call sites using Cookies.get() etc. may need updating. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes 21 CVEs in the abandoned axios 0.x branch including GHSA-898c-q2cr-xwhg (SSRF/header exposure). Note: major version bump — axios 1.x removes deprecated helpers and changes some error properties; review src/utils/request.js call sites. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
🔴 Test Coverage Grade:
|
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | 24.50% |
| Branch coverage | 18.66% |
Grade Scale
| Grade | Line Coverage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 A | ≥ 80% | Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴 |
| 🟡 B | 60-79% | Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉 |
| 🟠 C | 40-59% | Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬 |
| 🔴 D | 20-39% | Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖 |
| ⛔ F | < 20% | Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥 |
Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Upgrades fontawesome-svg-core, free-brands-svg-icons, free-solid-svg-icons to 6.7.2 and vue-fontawesome to 3.3.2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
🔴 Test Coverage Grade:
|
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | 24.50% |
| Branch coverage | 18.66% |
Grade Scale
| Grade | Line Coverage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 A | ≥ 80% | Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴 |
| 🟡 B | 60-79% | Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉 |
| 🟠 C | 40-59% | Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬 |
| 🔴 D | 20-39% | Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖 |
| ⛔ F | < 20% | Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥 |
Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run
npm run serve/start/build now set --openssl-legacy-provider automatically via node-options-wrapper.sh, only when the running Node actually needs it. The old manual instruction is not just redundant but actively harmful: a contributor who exports it persistently and later runs on Node 16 (what CI pins) crashes node outright, since that flag doesn't exist without OpenSSL 3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
| NODE_MAJOR=$(node -p "process.versions.node.split('.')[0]") | ||
| if [ "$NODE_MAJOR" -ge 17 ]; then | ||
| export NODE_OPTIONS="--openssl-legacy-provider ${NODE_OPTIONS}" | ||
| fi |
🔴 Test Coverage Grade:
|
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | 24.50% |
| Branch coverage | 18.66% |
Grade Scale
| Grade | Line Coverage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 A | ≥ 80% | Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴 |
| 🟡 B | 60-79% | Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉 |
| 🟠 C | 40-59% | Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬 |
| 🔴 D | 20-39% | Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖 |
| ⛔ F | < 20% | Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥 |
Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Suppressed comments (1)
ui/node-options-wrapper.sh:26
- The wrapper always injects
--openssl-legacy-providerfor Node >=17, but newer Node releases can reject this option inNODE_OPTIONS. If that happens,npm run serve/buildwill fail immediately even if the legacy provider workaround is no longer supported. Consider probing support before exporting the flag (and avoid integer-test errors ifnodeisn't available).
NODE_MAJOR=$(node -p "process.versions.node.split('.')[0]")
if [ "$NODE_MAJOR" -ge 17 ]; then
export NODE_OPTIONS="--openssl-legacy-provider${NODE_OPTIONS:+ ${NODE_OPTIONS}}"
fi
| # Build example: docker build -t <name> . | ||
|
|
||
| FROM node:14-bullseye AS build | ||
| FROM node:24-bullseye AS build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@vishesh92 , I think this means we have the choice to
- add the webpack upgrade in this PR, or
- change the node version to 20 and upgrade it in a new PR
(maybe seeing more bears on the road than actually are there)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I ran npm run build on my local witrh node 24 and it ran sucessfuly.
|
Hi @DaanHoogland please advise when this PR is ready for testing |
yes @nvazquez , should be. |
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
|
🔴 Test Coverage Grade:
|
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | 24.60% |
| Branch coverage | 18.80% |
Grade Scale
| Grade | Line Coverage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 A | ≥ 80% | Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴 |
| 🟡 B | 60-79% | Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉 |
| 🟠 C | 40-59% | Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬 |
| 🔴 D | 20-39% | Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖 |
| ⛔ F | < 20% | Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥 |
Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run



Description
This PR...
Fixes: #13631
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?