-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
User Content CSS Adjustment for tables #221
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
enhancementSomething we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.Something we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.mightfixEhh maybe... convince us all...Ehh maybe... convince us all...questionA question has been encountered by anyone and has remained unanswered until cleared.A question has been encountered by anyone and has remained unanswered until cleared.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementSomething we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.Something we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.mightfixEhh maybe... convince us all...Ehh maybe... convince us all...questionA question has been encountered by anyone and has remained unanswered until cleared.A question has been encountered by anyone and has remained unanswered until cleared.
Does anyone see an issue with adding the following CSS rule to common.css?
Currently in the Compatibility Matrix of this script anchored th tags are block level due to a general rule of:
... and messes up multiple anchored images inside the tag. This changed when the UI was updated. Since we support markup now it's easy to do a
<br />if we want one in a user defined th tag.EDIT: Another personal preference option is to add some faint lines and an offset background color for th tags like the right side panel defaults. Is this preferred?
Btw @sizzlemctwizzle
center,leftandrightare being sanitized from #190 and 23f47bc when used with gfm table support alignment and the classes may not be defined too. I haven't had a chance to find a way to filter through just those three yet but only in.user-contentwith th tags and exclude anything else... unless we need something else down the line.