-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 327
cuda.core: introduce copy options for Buffer.copy_{to/from} #2636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c8c6198
cuda.core: introduce copy options for Buffer.copy_{to/from}
juenglin 75161be
cuda.core: share Buffer.copy_to/copy_from options dispatch
juenglin c508a8d
test(cuda.core): cover Buffer.copy_to/copy_from size-mismatch rejection
juenglin 637099c
test(cuda.core): fix graph-capture options tests to avoid managed memory
juenglin bc260c2
cuda.core: route cuMemcpyWithAttributesAsync through a function-point…
juenglin 0464e98
fix argument checking
juenglin e66eb6c
relax copy with options to accept per-thread default stream
juenglin 742d498
remove UserWarning on fallback
juenglin 528d725
align fallback behavior with copy_batch
juenglin 1bb3625
raise if call with MemcpySrcAccessOrder.DURING_API_CALL requires fall…
juenglin 7717b03
consolidate new features in release notes
juenglin 9e7b50a
fix docstrings regarding GraphNode.memcpy
juenglin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have concerns about (1) minor-version-specific version gating, and (2) scope-creep inherent in using
resource_handlesfor things besides resource lifetime management. I see this merely extends an existing pattern, so neither of these should block merge; but I'd like to follow up.