Skip to content

Trivy Operator additionalVulnerabilityReportFields#9398

Closed
raouf-haddada wants to merge 0 commit intoDefectDojo:devfrom
raouf-haddada:trivy-operator-extra-fields
Closed

Trivy Operator additionalVulnerabilityReportFields#9398
raouf-haddada wants to merge 0 commit intoDefectDojo:devfrom
raouf-haddada:trivy-operator-extra-fields

Conversation

@raouf-haddada
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This feature allows adding Target, Class, PackagePath and PackageType already managed in trivy reports

related to:
trivy-operator additionalVulnerabilityReportFields

  # -- additionalVulnerabilityReportFields is a comma separated list of additional fields which
  # can be added to the VulnerabilityReport. Supported parameters: Description, Links, CVSS, Target, Class, PackagePath and PackageType
  additionalVulnerabilityReportFields: ""

@dryrunsecurity
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dryrunsecurity bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Contextual Security Analysis

As DryRun Security performs checks, we’ll summarize them here. You can always dive into the detailed results in the section below for checks.

Status DryRun Security Check
Sensitive Functions Analyzer
Configured Sensitive Files Check
Sensitive Files Analyzer

Chat with your AI-powered Security Buddy by typing @dryrunsecurity followed by your question into a comment.
Example: @dryrunsecurity What are common security issues with web application cookies?

Install and configure more repositories at DryRun Security

Comment thread dojo/tools/trivy_operator/parser.py Outdated
@Maffooch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Will be good too approve when all tests are passing

@raouf-haddada raouf-haddada force-pushed the trivy-operator-extra-fields branch from 782af37 to fdb1153 Compare January 31, 2024 16:07
@raouf-haddada raouf-haddada deleted the trivy-operator-extra-fields branch January 31, 2024 16:07
@raouf-haddada
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Replaced by:
#9452
Thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants