Repository navigation
Remove external dependencies? #10
Description
Activity
I might seperate the controllers and all other handlers to seperate package "uHttpSharp-extras" like some other open source projects do.
In that case,
uHttpSharpwill stay slim with only "core" classes, whileuHttpSharp-extraswill have the bundledhandlers,controllers,modelBinders, etc'.What do you think?
Shani.
Looks good.
Would you use uHttpSharp core without the bundled handlers, controllers, etc'..?
I'm interested on mapping string (or regex) to a function. I don't mind the extra stuff. The external dependency is the biggest drawback.
@igorgatis Log4net is not a dependency anymore, thanks to #13
Can we update the other dependencies in a new release?
As an embeddable module, it would be nice if this project had no external dependencies. Looking at the code, it seems like log4net could be easily replaced by a delegate (passed as optional parameter to HttpServer constructor). I wonder whether JSON could also be handled by delegates. Alternatively, all controllers could live in separate DLL and that DLL would require Newtonsoft.Json.