modernize loader#1279
modernize loader#1279dcodeIO merged 9 commits intoAssemblyScript:masterfrom MaxGraey:use-templates-in-loader
Conversation
| const last = U16[offset + CHUNKSIZE - 1]; | ||
| const size = last >= 0xD800 && last < 0xDC00 ? CHUNKSIZE - 1 : CHUNKSIZE; | ||
| parts.push(String.fromCharCode.apply(String, U16.subarray(offset, offset += size))); | ||
| parts += String.fromCharCode.apply(String, U16.subarray(offset, offset += size)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you sure that this is always faster? Would imagine that it is for smaller strings, but once parts grows bigger, it might slow down substantially.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On Chrome it should be definitely faster. See this tests:
https://twitter.com/MaxGraey/status/1232045301374111744
https://esbench.com/bench/5e540d53328a52009e8b1b22
It relate to string reversing but it also use same technique as string decoding
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You don't need to do String.fromCharCode.apply(String) could simply do something like
const fromCharCode = String.fromCharCode;
fromCharCode.apply(null, theArray);There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this affect performance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dcodeIO I made micro benchmark which more relate to this case:
https://gist.github.com/MaxGraey/6db5c6c6d7e4a0f45154b73a5e130976
and it seems string concat approach faster in 3 times
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While 4K+ is already a reasonably long string, an interesting measurement there would be how long a string has to be for both approaches to execute in an equal time span, if at all. That would help to inform if it is good enough in any case, or if we'd need another code path to deal with strings longer than X.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, the test string is exclusively ASCII currently, so it might be that engines optimize this differently than strings that have at least one non-LATIN1 character. Both cases would be interesting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on my benchmarks inside Node, concat is faster than +:
https://github.com/aminya/typescript-optimization#string--vs-concat
|
Thanks :) |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 0.11.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
4 participants
getStringImplby switching from collecting array parts to direct string concatenations